
In summer 2004 the Board of Trustees engaged Art & Science Group LLC of Baltimore, MD to research the College’s position in the marketplace and to help it identify a strong, true, and compelling identity that would distinguish it from its competitors while remaining a single-sex college. Throughout its 15-month project, A&S worked with a client committee comprising faculty, senior administrators, alumnae, and trustees. A&S undertook the project in steps, first visiting the College to understand its mission and current strengths and then gathering data from alumnae, current and withdrawn students, prospective students, and admitted applicants.
At each step, the A&S team discussed its findings with the client committee, the strategic planning steering committee and frequently with faculty, staff, and trustee audiences. A&S presented its final report to the client and strategic planning steering committees, trustees, faculty, and staff in November 2005.
The A&S team’s first initiative was a 2-day intensive visit to campus. Meeting with faculty, staff, students, alumnae, and trustees, the A&S team developed a strategic analysis report, mirroring what they had learned.
The client committee worked with A&S to craft four positioning platforms to test for effectiveness in giving the College a viable, differentiated market position as a single-sex college The committee distilled the four platforms from numerous recommendations, benchmarking them against requirements that they be bold, native, true to the College’s values, and achievable. The platforms tested the College’s ability to claim a distinctive position as
A&S also tested responses to initiatives such as enrolling more international students, offering extensive pre-professional programs, emphasizing the fine arts for all students, enrolling a more racially and ethnically diverse student body, enrolling graduate students, making environmental issues a central part of the curriculum and campus life, becoming a coed institution, and providing extensive opportunities for hands-on learning through travel, internships, and community service.
A&S conducted blind (*) telephone surveys of R-MWC alumnae using a survey crafted jointly by A&S and the client committee. A&S presented the findings in March 2005.
* = A blind survey is one in which the client is not identified.
A&S completed telephone interviews with current students and also with students who had withdrawn over the previous two years. To the platforms and initiatives identified above, they added allowing upper class students to live off-campus and offering different on-campus housing options such as apartment style dormitories or suites. They presented their findings in April 2005.
A&S conducted a blind telephone survey of high school seniors who had inquired into R-MWC and presented their findings in June 2005.
The A&S team conducted a blind telephone survey of admitted applicants, and reported their findings in September 2005.
Both current students and alumnae have deep emotional attachments to the College and feel strongly that they have benefited from having a single-sex education. The problem is that the market for women’s colleges – particularly for one that is small, liberal arts, and not in an urban area – has shrunk to an alarmingly small size. The platforms and initiatives that A&S tested in its first study are either not appealing enough to counter prospects’ resistance to single-sex education or are features which prospects already believe the College possesses.
A&S distilled its year’s research into scenarios of change for the College, estimating the impact of each on the College’s future strength.
Single Gender, Incremental Change Scenario -- Not recommended
In this scenario, the College makes only incremental changes such as adding new majors, offering flexible evening adult and graduate courses, funding more social events, partnering with an urban campus, and increasing fund raising with alumnae through educating them about the challenges for a single-gender institution. While adopting these measures would provide some benefits, they would not likely increase enrollment enough to address the anticipated operating deficit. Without generating an enormous amount of revenue in short order, R-MWC would be in a much weaker position to make bold changes in the future:
Single Gender, Radical Change Scenario -- Does not appear feasible
The College undertakes three critical initiatives simultaneously and immediately:
A&S modeling indicates that matriculants at the College would increase by a significant amount under this scenario. The report notes, however, that prospective students in the College’s own pool view the single-sex nature of R-MWC as an overwhelming negative and show a strong preference for coeducation. Their research does not reveal any initiative that the College could undertake that would alone counterbalance prospects’ strong preference for coeducation.
Given the size of the challenge and the fact that two of the three measures required for success in this scenario are controlled largely by forces outside of the College (the endowment campaign and the downtown Lynchburg partnership), A&S doubts that this is a viable option for the College.
Coed Plus a Distinctive Appeal Scenario -- Recommend further research to determine if feasible
The A&S study was not intended to examine the appeal of a coed R-MWC to prospects who do not currently inquire or apply to the College, but its research indicates that becoming coed would have an enormously positive impact on the women currently in the College’s pool.
A&S research estimates an upside potential of becoming coed would be twice that of the Honors College scenario.
The A&S report acknowledges also the substantial risks of going coed, especially the possibility of alumnae and current student disengagement. Further, the College would still need both a distinctive appeal and expanded social opportunities to attract and retain students.
A&S was initially commissioned to study the viability of R-MWC as a single-sex institution rather than the possibility of its becoming coed, and its research was not focused on the viability of the coed option. Its final report recommended additional external and internal study to identify whether it is possible for R-MWC to attract male as well as female students, what additional appeals would be necessary, and how the community would undertake such a change.
In response to the A&S report and the recommendation of the Strategic Planning Steering Committee, the Board of Trustees has approved additional study over the next six months. A&S’s external study will address prospects’ reactions to a coed R-MWC in conjunction with various positioning models and initiatives and also test selected models that were not a part of the initial study to see if they have resonance in conjunction with a single-sex R-MWC. A&S is expected to report its findings in May-June 2006.
Concurrent with the external study, the College continues to gather input from students and alumnae. At the same time, an internal group of administrators, faculty, and trustees will study a number of issues:
The College will also engage in studying the experiences of colleges that have stayed single sex successfully and those that have transitioned successfully to coed.
After information from both internal and external research on the College’s strategic direction has been studied, the Strategic Planning Steering Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Trustees on future direction and positioning of the College. The Steering Committee’s recommendation and the Board’s action are anticipated during the summer of 2006.